Re: Complaint against Commissioner of Police, Heydrich Himmler RamperSad.
Dear Mad Hatteea
Am I supposed to be appreciative of your “helping spirit”? Given that the police are a department of government and my complaint was about their dereliction of duty, I am somewhat surprised that you have not made a more convincing pretence of exercising the investigative powers endowed upon you by the Constitution and are abdicating so quickly from your sworn duty. In my judgement you are no longer the Ombudsman. Your parting words imply that my complaint is criminal in nature, so at least you recognise that the police are in gross violation of the law.
Your final advice to address my grievances to the Director of Public Prosecutions is noted. However, since this member of the Boolell Mafia cosa nostra was bcc’ed on my original complaint top you, it has already fallen on deaf ears. It seems he only acts at the arbitrary behest of the Führer and his kangaroo court and not to protect the well being of ordinary citizens or uphold the law. I could enact my threat to privately prosecute the Commissioner of Police but since the DPP has the power to stop this, it hardly seems worth it does it? [Of course Mr DPP, should you wish to repent, now would be an opportune moment don’t you think?]
It has become clear that the Constitutional checks and balances of Mauritian democracy have been infiltrated by the local mutant macaques – see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil – permitting the orangutan Master de Baie-Terre – DO ALL EVIL – to act with impunity. Therefore, I am taking the only course of action left open to me and calling upon Vishnu to incarnate as Kalki, the Final Avatar, and destroy the demonic horde that you seem so terrified of. May He annihilate the evil of irregular freemasonry that has infested the Divine Island like the plague of rats that preceded it.
Please inform the vipSSu that any attempt dispose of me in the same manner as the suicide bummer will be met with irresistible Farce.
God save the Republic! Insha’Allah.
Regards
Dr Rishi-Rich-Rashid Munisamy
NOT the 3 R’s of “Sustainability”?
[Note to editors: Dr Munisamy is an Abehda Darvidian “Hindu” by descent, a Gnostic “Christian” by up-bringing, a Sufi “Muslim” by conversion and a Zen “Buddhist” by practice, hence the four names he uses. He also uses the name Ricardo but only when seducing the ladies with his characteristic Italian panache. In fact, with long hair and a goatee, he is often mistaken for David, the Sicilian anti-Mafia manager the boîte de nuit “Les Enfants Terribles”. This is a funny coincidence because his brother is also called David. “NOT” is the name he prefers in court because it permits the following dialogue:
Judge: Is your name Dr Richard Luke Munisamy?
Dr Mu: No it is NOT your honour!
Judge: Then what is it?
Dr Mu: I told you it is NOT your honour.
Judge; You have not told me anything.
Dr Mu: I am telling you.
Judge: You are not!
Dr Mu: There, you just said it.
Judge: Said what?
Dr Mu: What my name is?
Judge: Oh no I did not!
Dr Mu: Oh yes you did.
Judge: What? Your name is Dr Richard Luke Munisamy is it not?
Dr Mu: No and yes your honour!
Judge: What do you mean “No and yes”?
Dr Mu: Actually it isn’t so back and white.
Judge: That is not logical!
Dr Mu: No, your honour, it is fuzzy logical.
Judge: Dr Richard Luke Munisamy, you are in contempt of court!
Dr Mu: No I AM NOT your honour! You are simply choosing not to listen! (Hear no evil 😉
In the Hindu pantheon, Lord Vishnu is the God of Preservation and any correlation with the word “Sustainability” is purely coincidental. In this world you can be certain of nothing except that Dr Munisamy is NOT the Tenth Avatar! Will you crown him the Mauritian King (of Comedy)? Of course, if you do not appreciate his sense of humour, you may conclude he is simply a harmless schizophrenic! ]
On 29 November 2011 15:00, Registry wrote:
Dr. Richard Munisamy
Sir,
Will you please refer to your email dated 25 November 2011.
My Office acknowledged receipt of same on the same day.
Although criminal matters do not fall to be considered by our Office, in a helping spirit I queried the Commissioner of Police about your complaint on 28 November 2011 and required prompt action on his part.
On that day you phoned our Office in order to inform us that you had received another threat the day before and you were informed that we had taken up the matter with the Commissioner of Police.
We are now in receipt of your email dated 28 November 2011 in which you state that you have “absolutely no confidence in the police to protect me”.
May I, in the circumstances and following your request, inform you that you can address your grievance to the Director of Public Prosecutions.
(S.M. HATTEEA)
Ombudsman
Disclaimer Notice:
This e-mail message (including any attachments) is intended for the addressee only, and may contain confidential information. The unauthorised use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any information contained within it is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the author and delete this e-mail (including any attachments) immediately in its entirety.
This e-mail message has been swept by a virus checker for the presence of known computer viruses. Besides, any opinion or other information in this email (including any attachments) that does not have anything to do with the official business of the Government of Mauritius, is personal to the author, and therefore does not engage any liability whatsoever of the Government of Mauritius.
The above statement does not constitute an acceptance of liability on the part of the Government of Mauritius or its employees in the event of technical or virus issues generated by this e-mail. It is the responsibility of the recipient to take adequate security measures. Further, the Government of Mauritius or its employees do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information contained in the email (including any attachments) and/or reliance or its availability at any time. The recipient must also verify/check any information with the relevant Government department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the contents of this email (including any attachments).
This guy’s a comedian….
This guy is a comedian. Who the hell will ever take you seriously. You have a problem with absolutely everyone.
In fact those going to Hell do take us seriously…
Dear Mr NOT,
I am afraid you are barking up the wrong tree. Asking the ombudsman, otherwise known as the Mad Hatter, to do his job is like shouting at your broken down car to ‘start, you fucking imbecile’. The answer is a foregone conclusion: prevarication accompanied with the expression of his ‘full support’ but followed by complete apathy. Your concerns should be addressed to the Don Corleone of Mauritian politics, the idiot who keeps getting voted in by an electorate of idiots. He controls everything, including the ability to pull the strings of those well known puppets at the DPP’s office, ICAC, those ‘human rights’ organisations, MBC, etc etc. In fact, he controls everything and Martin Scorcese is considering employing him as consultant supremo for the sequel to Goodfellas.
Finally, don’t bother with the Commissioner of Police. He does not exist. He is a cardboard cut out which is brought out now again by the Don to show an idiotic population that we have a wonderful law and order situation in Paradise Island. However, a match between Mr NOT and a cardboard cut out umpired by louche men in wigs and gowns sounds like a promising piece of entertainment in this rather drab world. So, go for it Mr NOT, preferably at the speed of knots and I wish you well in your endeavour to get these bastards knotted and kept in a dark basement till the end of time.
Dear Paul,
You are lucky that this blog is not moderated or your comment would surely have been deleted for its foul language. You seem to have one or two anger issues projected upon “Don Corleone”. Are you sure you have the right primate? Surely no REAL Mafia boss worth his salt would submit himself to the possible humiliation of losing an election? Would he not hide in the shadows and pull the strings of whichever puppet became Prime Minister?
However, you are correct in asserting that the gibbon who is currently parading himself as the king of the jungle has a lot to answer for. Rather than tying his troops up in knots might we be permitted to turn them into Don-errr kebabs? 😉 Then we can turn the flame of justice upon the Sith Lord and cook the f*cking lot! Damn it your foul language is contagious!
Just what exactly genuinely encouraged you to post âOPEN LETTER TO THE
OMBUDSMAN « We Love Mauritius’ Blogâ? I reallyabsolutely enjoyed reading it! I appreciate it ,Abraham
A great question. This sort of humour is one of the ways I deal with stress. At the time I had received multiple threats against my life and the police were doing nothing to protect me (such as arresting or even warning the offender). One year later they acknowledged that an offence had been committed against me. If I had been killed who would have been guilty, the person who committed the act or the CP for negligence? Well I guess I got a year of free life insurance…